82,510
edits
If in doubt, stick it in: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|negotiation|}}“[[If in doubt, stick it in]] | {{a|negotiation|{{image|Casanova|png|Casanova yesterday. Just, ah, sign here, baby.}}}}Also known as [[Casanova’s advice]] or the [[credit officer’s refrain]], “[[If in doubt, stick it in]]” — a finger-post to the nearest [[negotiation oubliette]] — is nonetheless an admonition that rings daily around the cloistered spaces of every institution but is only offered, in these pages, with a generous helping of irony. | ||
“Well, it can’t hurt to ask.” | |||
But it ''can'' hurt to ask. Everytime you ask, a little part of your negotiation team dies. | |||
So: better advice: ''[[murder your darlings]]''. Or, as our brethren [[legal eagle]]s would say, [[murder your darlings|subject one’s darlings, or procure that such darlings are subjected to, culpable homicide]]. | |||
There are two kinds of pointless things we habitually stick in contracts: absurd asks by the risk team, which all at the coalface know will be just as habitually rejected by any counterparty advisor with a pulse, even if the senior risk team draw come kind of delusional comfort from the fact they such terms are being sought at all; the other is matters of tedious compliance — be they accommodations of [[Prime brokerage disclosure annex|misconceived pedantries buried in developing regulation]] or internal [[policy|policy overreactions]] brought about during the recovery process from [[blunt trauma]] — in either case resulting in gnomic confections piped into the back end of your contract templates like so much kitchen dirt swept under a rug, only to fossilise there, unloved, undisturbed, until overlaid with yet more scar tissue. | There are two kinds of pointless things we habitually stick in contracts: absurd asks by the risk team, which all at the coalface know will be just as habitually rejected by any counterparty advisor with a pulse, even if the senior risk team draw come kind of delusional comfort from the fact they such terms are being sought at all; the other is matters of tedious compliance — be they accommodations of [[Prime brokerage disclosure annex|misconceived pedantries buried in developing regulation]] or internal [[policy|policy overreactions]] brought about during the recovery process from [[blunt trauma]] — in either case resulting in gnomic confections piped into the back end of your contract templates like so much kitchen dirt swept under a rug, only to fossilise there, unloved, undisturbed, until overlaid with yet more scar tissue. | ||