Specified Transaction - 1992 ISDA Provision

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search

1992 ISDA Master Agreement
A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Resources and navigation

Section Specified Transaction in a Nutshell

Use at your own risk, campers!

Full text of Section Specified Transaction

Specified Transaction” means, subject to the Schedule, (a) any transaction (including an agreement with respect thereto) now existing or hereafter entered into between one party to this Agreement (or any Credit Support Provider of such party or any applicable Specified Entity of such party) and the other party to this Agreement (or any Credit Support Provider of such other party or any applicable Specified Entity of such other party) which is a rate swap transaction, basis swap, forward rate transaction, commodity swap, commodity option, equity or equity index swap, equity or equity index option, bond option, interest rate option, foreign exchange transaction, cap transaction, floor transaction, collar transaction, currency swap transaction, cross-currency rate swap transaction, currency option or any other similar transaction (including any option with respect to any of these transactions), (b) any combination of these transactions and (c) any other transaction identified as a Specified Transaction in this Agreement or the relevant confirmation.

Related agreements and comparisons

Related Agreements
Click here for the text of Section Specified Transaction in the 2002 ISDA
Click to compare this section in the 1992 ISDA and 2002 ISDA.

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Content and comparisons

A Specified Transaction under the 1992 ISDA is, by the standards of ISDA’s crack drafting squad™, monosyllabic to the point of being terse.

Under the 2002 ISDA, it is expressed with far more of the squad’s signature sense of derring-do and the Byzantine, expanding the basic definition:



We are going to go out on a limb here and say that little parenthetical “(including an agreement with respect thereto)” is, if not deliberately designed that way, is at least calculated[2] to capture the Credit Support Annex which, yes, is a Transaction under an ISDA Master Agreement but no, is not really a swap or anything really like one. There is enough chat about Credit support Providers (yes, yes, the counterparty itself is of course not a Credit support Provider) to make us think, on a fair, large and liberal interpretation, that a default under the CSA to a swap Transaction is meant to be covered.


See also

Template:M sa 1992 ISDA Specified Transaction



  1. Oh, look! Anyone remember Enron? Anyone feeling nostalgic for the good old days when men were men, fraud was fraud, financial accountants were profit centres and anything seemed possible? No?
  2. In the sense of being “likely”.