Close-out Amount - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Text replace - "1992 ISDA Master Agreement" to "{{1992ma}}"
No edit summary
 
(29 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=={{1992ma}}==
{{nman|isda|2002|Close-out Amount}}
Close-out amount concept doesn't exist under the [[1992 ISDA Master]]. Instead, terminated transactions are determined according to {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} or {{isdaprov|Loss}}. {{isdacomparison}}
 
 
==[[2002 ISDA Master]] Agreement==
also from the [[you'll be sorry you asked]] file.
 
“Close-out Amount” means, with respect to each Terminated Transaction or each group of Terminated Transactions
and a Determining Party, the amount of the losses or costs of the Determining Party that are or would be incurred
under then prevailing circumstances (expressed as a positive number) or gains of the Determining Party that are or
would be realised under then prevailing circumstances (expressed as a negative number) in replacing, or in providing
for the Determining Party the economic equivalent of, (a) the material terms of that Terminated Transaction or group
of Terminated Transactions, including the payments and deliveries by the parties under Section 2(a)(i) in respect of
that Terminated Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions that would, but for the occurrence of the relevant
Early Termination Date, have been required after that date (assuming satisfaction of the conditions precedent in
Section 2(a)(iii)) and (b) the option rights of the parties in respect of that Terminated Transaction or group of
Terminated Transactions.
Any Close-out Amount will be determined by the Determining Party (or its agent), which will act in good faith and
use commercially reasonable procedures in order to produce a commercially reasonable result. The Determining
Party may determine a Close-out Amount for any group of Terminated Transactions or any individual Terminated
Transaction but, in the aggregate, for not less than all Terminated Transactions. Each Close-out Amount will be
determined as of the Early Termination Date or, if that would not be commercially reasonable, as of the date or dates
following the Early Termination Date as would be commercially reasonable.
Unpaid Amounts in respect of a Terminated Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions and legal fees and out-
of-pocket expenses referred to in Section 11 are to be excluded in all determinations of Close-out Amounts.
In determining a Close-out Amount, the Determining Party may consider any relevant information, including, without
limitation, one or more of the following types of information:―
(i) quotations (either firm or indicative) for replacement transactions supplied by one or more third parties that
may take into account the creditworthiness of the Determining Party at the time the quotation is provided and the
terms of any relevant documentation, including credit support documentation, between the Determining Party and the
third party providing the quotation;
(ii) information consisting of relevant market data in the relevant market supplied by one or more third parties
including, without limitation, relevant rates, prices, yields, yield curves, volatilities, spreads, correlations or other
relevant market data in the relevant market; or
(iii) information of the types described in clause (i) or (ii) above from internal sources (including any of the
Determining Party’s Affiliates) if that information is of the same type used by the Determining Party in the regular
course of its business for the valuation of similar transactions.
The Determining Party will consider, taking into account the standards and procedures described in this definition,
quotations pursuant to clause (i) above or relevant market data pursuant to clause (ii) above unless the Determining
Party reasonably believes in good faith that such quotations or relevant market data are not readily available or would
produce a result that would not satisfy those standards. When considering information described in clause (i), (ii) or
(iii) above, the Determining Party may include costs of funding, to the extent costs of funding are not and would not
be a component of the other information being utilised. Third parties supplying quotations pursuant to clause (i)
above or market data pursuant to clause (ii) above may include, without limitation, dealers in the relevant markets,
end-users of the relevant product, information vendors, brokers and other sources of market information.
Without duplication of amounts calculated based on information described in clause (i), (ii) or (iii) above, or other
relevant information, and when it is commercially reasonable to do so, the Determining Party may in addition
consider in calculating a Close-out Amount any loss or cost incurred in connection with its terminating, liquidating or
re-establishing any hedge related to a Terminated Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions (or any gain
resulting from any of them).
Commercially reasonable procedures used in determining a Close-out Amount may include the following:―
(1) application to relevant market data from third parties pursuant to clause (ii) above or information from
internal sources pursuant to clause (iii) above of pricing or other valuation models that are, at the time of the
determination of the Close-out Amount, used by the Determining Party in the regular course of its business in pricing
or valuing transactions between the Determining Party and unrelated third parties that are similar to the Terminated
Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions; and
(2) application of different valuation methods to Terminated Transactions or groups of Terminated Transactions
depending on the type, complexity, size or number of the Terminated Transactions or group of Terminated
Transactions.
 
{{isdaanatomy|Close-out Amount}}
{{isia}}
*{{isdaprov|Market Quotation}}
*{{isdaprov|Loss}}

Latest revision as of 16:55, 14 August 2024

2002 ISDA Master Agreement

A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Close-out Amount in a Nutshell

The JC’s Nutshell summary of this term has moved uptown to the subscription-only ninja tier. For the cost of ½ a weekly 🍺 you can get it here. Sign up at Substack. You can even ask questions! Ask about it here.

Original text

Close-out Amount means, with respect to each Terminated Transaction or each group of Terminated Transactions and a Determining Party, the amount of the losses or costs of the Determining Party that are or would be incurred under then prevailing circumstances (expressed as a positive number) or gains of the Determining Party that are or would be realised under then prevailing circumstances (expressed as a negative number) in replacing, or in providing for the Determining Party the economic equivalent of, (a) the material terms of that Terminated Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions, including the payments and deliveries by the parties under Section 2(a)(i) in respect of that Terminated Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions that would, but for the occurrence of the relevant Early Termination Date, have been required after that date (assuming satisfaction of the conditions precedent in Section 2(a)(iii)) and (b) the option rights of the parties in respect of that Terminated Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions.
Any Close-out Amount will be determined by the Determining Party (or its agent), which will act in good faith and use commercially reasonable procedures in order to produce a commercially reasonable result. The Determining Party may determine a Close-out Amount for any group of Terminated Transactions or any individual Terminated Transaction but, in the aggregate, for not less than all Terminated Transactions. Each Close-out Amount will be determined as of the Early Termination Date or, if that would not be commercially reasonable, as of the date or dates following the Early Termination Date as would be commercially reasonable.
Unpaid Amounts in respect of a Terminated Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions and legal fees and out- of-pocket expenses referred to in Section 11 are to be excluded in all determinations of Close-out Amounts.
In determining a Close-out Amount, the Determining Party may consider any relevant information, including, without limitation, one or more of the following types of information:―

(i) quotations (either firm or indicative) for replacement transactions supplied by one or more third parties that may take into account the creditworthiness of the Determining Party at the time the quotation is provided and the terms of any relevant documentation, including credit support documentation, between the Determining Party and the third party providing the quotation;
(ii) information consisting of relevant market data in the relevant market supplied by one or more third parties including, without limitation, relevant rates, prices, yields, yield curves, volatilities, spreads, correlations or other relevant market data in the relevant market; or
(iii) information of the types described in clause (i) or (ii) above from internal sources (including any of the Determining Party’s Affiliates) if that information is of the same type used by the Determining Party in the regular course of its business for the valuation of similar transactions.

The Determining Party will consider, taking into account the standards and procedures described in this definition, quotations pursuant to clause (i) above or relevant market data pursuant to clause (ii) above unless the Determining Party reasonably believes in good faith that such quotations or relevant market data are not readily available or would produce a result that would not satisfy those standards. When considering information described in clause (i), (ii) or (iii) above, the Determining Party may include costs of funding, to the extent costs of funding are not and would not be a component of the other information being utilised. Third parties supplying quotations pursuant to clause (i) above or market data pursuant to clause (ii) above may include, without limitation, dealers in the relevant markets, end-users of the relevant product, information vendors, brokers and other sources of market information.
Without duplication of amounts calculated based on information described in clause (i), (ii) or (iii) above, or other relevant information, and when it is commercially reasonable to do so, the Determining Party may in addition consider in calculating a Close-out Amount any loss or cost incurred in connection with its terminating, liquidating or re-establishing any hedge related to a Terminated Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions (or any gain resulting from any of them).
Commercially reasonable procedures used in determining a Close-out Amount may include the following:―

(1) application to relevant market data from third parties pursuant to clause (ii) above or information from internal sources pursuant to clause (iii) above of pricing or other valuation models that are, at the time of the determination of the Close-out Amount, used by the Determining Party in the regular course of its business in pricing or valuing transactions between the Determining Party and unrelated third parties that are similar to the Terminated Transaction or group of Terminated Transactions; and
(2) application of different valuation methods to Terminated Transactions or groups of Terminated Transactions depending on the type, complexity, size or number of the Terminated Transactions or group of Terminated Transactions.
See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.
The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext)
Preamble Pre Pre Pre
Interpretation 1 1 1
Obligns/Payment 2 2 2
Representations 3 3 3
Agreements 4 4 4
EODs & Term Events 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityFMTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSSCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUM
Early Termination 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculations; Payment DatePayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ET
Transfer 7 7 7
Contractual Currency 8 8 8
Miscellaneous 9 9 9
Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10
Expenses 11 11 11
Notices 12 12 12
Governing Law 13 13 13
Definitions 14 14 14
Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule
Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1
Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2
Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3
Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4
Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5

Resources and Navigation

Index: Click to expand:

Comparisons

ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ introduced the Close-out Amount into the 2002 ISDA to correct the total trainwreck of a close-out methodology set out in the 1992 ISDA.

So the dirty secret is that there isn’t a “Close-out Amount” as such under a 1992 ISDA (or the 1987 ISDA) but, in places on this wiki, we’ll refer to one anyway, because it is better, more elegant, more stylish prose than

“... the amount determined following early termination of a Terminated Transaction using Market Quotation or Loss (as the case may be) and the Second Method, seeing as no-one in their right mind would agree to the First Method, under the 1992 ISDA”.

In the context of a 1992 ISDA that is what we mean by “Close-out Amount”.

Key differences

Well, there are some significant differences between Close-out Amount and Loss/Market Quotation under the 1992 ISDA, and we go into these in more detail in the premium section Close-out Amount v Loss/MQ showdown.

Basics

In the “good old days” of the 1992 ISDA, you valued Terminated Transactions according to Market Quotation or Loss and those un-intuitive and — well,in the case of the first, flat-out nutso — “First” and “Second” Methods. There is a “Settlement Amount” concept under the 1992 ISDA, but it only really relates to Market Quotation.

Note the prominent requirement to achieve a “reasonable” (1992 ISDA) or “commercially reasonable” (2002 ISDA) result. On what that latter lovely expression means see Barclays v Unicredit. Spoiler: it’s basically good for brokers, as long as they aren’t being total dicks.

On the difference between an “Early Termination Amount” and a “Close-out Amount”

Regrettably, the 1992 ISDA features neither an Early Termination Amount nor a Close-out Amount. The 2002 ISDA has both, which looks like rather an indulgence until you realise that they do different things.

A Close-out Amount is the termination value for a single Transaction, or a related group of Transactions that a Non-Defaulting Party or Non-Affected Party calculates while closing out an 2002 ISDA, but it is not the final, overall sum due under the ISDA Master Agreement itself. Each of the determined Transaction Close-out Amounts summed with the various Unpaid Amounts to arrive at the Early Termination Amount, which is the total net sum due under the ISDA Master Agreement after the close-out process. (See Section 6(e)(i) for more on that).

Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics👇

See also

1992 equivalents

References