Or any part thereof: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Or any part thereof.png|thumb|Stick THAT in your pipe and smoke it, [[Counselor]]]]{{f|Or any part thereof}} and its many variants is a piece of {{tag|flannel}} perfect for wiping clean the face of just the kind of cherub who would never get his little boat-race grubby in the first place. You know the kind: butter wouldn’t melt in his jumped-up little gob.
{{a|negotiation|}}
{{f|Or any part thereof}} and its many variants is a piece of {{tag|flannel}} perfect for wiping clean the face of just the kind of cherub who would never get his little boat-race grubby in the first place. You know the kind: butter wouldn’t melt in his jumped-up little gob.


When it comes to face-washing, you may need a {{tag|flannel}}, but to state it baldly and without qualification omits the undeniable fact you may not need ''the whole thing''. As pathologically as it abhors elegance, legal language deplores a vacuum, and if you’re the sort of [[Mediocre lawyer|attorney]] who believes that a sum does not include each of its parts taken individually, this expression is perfect for the pregnant pause you might otherwise have in your draft.
When it comes to face-washing, you may need a {{tag|flannel}}, but to state it baldly and without qualification omits the undeniable fact you may not need ''the whole thing''.  
 
It is also a satisfying way of “improving” the drafting of the sort of pernickety [[counselor]] who tires us all with {{sex|his}} leaden augmentations. We all know one<ref>Dammit we all know THOUSANDS.</ref>. However pedantic your adversary may be, in a long document he will be bound to have missed a simple construction somewhere. It is a simple matter to find it. And then, here is your slam dunk, your dead fish shot in a barrel — with this simple, and harmless unguent, you can at last have one over this cretinous fellow, appending it in the privacy of your own chambers with the lawyer’s flourish that, in other fields of endeavour, invites the expression “[[in your face|IN YOUR ''FACE'']]”, prompts a footballer’s swept-back wing fighter-jet impersonation or knee-slide to the corner flag, enables a baseballer's serial high-five as he ambles past the dug-out, or a wide receiver’s flamboyant pimp-roll round the end-zone as he awaits his team mates' acclamation.


Now, as pathologically as it abhors elegance, legal language deplores a vacuum, and if you’re the sort of [[Mediocre lawyer|attorney]] who believes that a sum does not include each of its parts taken individually, this work-a-day expression is perfect for the pregnant pause you might otherwise have in your draft.


[[File:Or any part thereof.png|thumb|300px|right|Stick ''that'' in your pipe and smoke it, [[Counselor]]]]It is also a satisfying way of “improving” the drafting of the sort of pernickety [[counselor]] who has been aggravating a [[negotiation]] process with leaden augmentations. We all know one<ref>Dammit we all know THOUSANDS.</ref>. However pedantic your adversary may be, in a long document he will be bound to have missed a simple construction somewhere. It is a simple matter to find it. And then, here is your slam dunk, your dead fish shot in a barrel — with this simple, and harmless unguent, you can at last have one over this cretinous fellow, appending it in the privacy of your own chambers with the lawyer’s flourish that, in other fields of endeavour, invites the expression “[[in your face|IN YOUR ''FACE'']]”, prompts a footballer’s swept-back wing fighter-jet impersonation or knee-slide to the corner flag, enables a baseballer's serial high-five as he ambles past the dug-out, or a wide receiver’s flamboyant pimp-roll round the end-zone as he awaits his team mates' acclamation.
{{seealso}}
*[[Negotiation]]
{{plainenglish}}
{{plainenglish}}
{{c|ontological uncertainty}}
{{c|ontological uncertainty}}
{{ref}}

Revision as of 15:52, 27 December 2018

Negotiation Anatomy™

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


Or any part thereof and its many variants is a piece of flannel perfect for wiping clean the face of just the kind of cherub who would never get his little boat-race grubby in the first place. You know the kind: butter wouldn’t melt in his jumped-up little gob.

When it comes to face-washing, you may need a flannel, but to state it baldly and without qualification omits the undeniable fact you may not need the whole thing.

Now, as pathologically as it abhors elegance, legal language deplores a vacuum, and if you’re the sort of attorney who believes that a sum does not include each of its parts taken individually, this work-a-day expression is perfect for the pregnant pause you might otherwise have in your draft.

Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, Counselor

It is also a satisfying way of “improving” the drafting of the sort of pernickety counselor who has been aggravating a negotiation process with leaden augmentations. We all know one[1]. However pedantic your adversary may be, in a long document he will be bound to have missed a simple construction somewhere. It is a simple matter to find it. And then, here is your slam dunk, your dead fish shot in a barrel — with this simple, and harmless unguent, you can at last have one over this cretinous fellow, appending it in the privacy of your own chambers with the lawyer’s flourish that, in other fields of endeavour, invites the expression “IN YOUR FACE”, prompts a footballer’s swept-back wing fighter-jet impersonation or knee-slide to the corner flag, enables a baseballer's serial high-five as he ambles past the dug-out, or a wide receiver’s flamboyant pimp-roll round the end-zone as he awaits his team mates' acclamation.

See also

Plain English Anatomy™ Noun | Verb | Adjective | Adverb | Preposition | Conjunction | Latin | Germany | Flannel | Legal triplicate | Nominalisation | Murder your darlings

References

  1. ↑ Dammit we all know THOUSANDS.
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Or_any_part_thereof&oldid=27638"