Failure to Deliver - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===Table of contents=== | ===Table of contents=== | ||
{{2010 GMSLA Section 9 TOC}} | {{2010 GMSLA Section 9 TOC}} | ||
==={{gmslaprov|Mini | ==={{gmslaprov|Mini close-out}}=== | ||
This is the fabled '''{{gmslaprov|mini close-out}}''' provision of the {{gmsla}}. | This is the fabled '''{{gmslaprov|mini close-out}}''' provision of the {{gmsla}}. | ||
===Failure to return {{gmslaprov|Collateral}} or {{gmslaprov|Securities}} is not an {{gmslaprov|Event of Default}}. What ''is'' then?=== | ===Failure to return {{gmslaprov|Collateral}} or {{gmslaprov|Securities}} is not an {{gmslaprov|Event of Default}}. What ''is'' then?=== | ||
{{Failure to pay under GMSLA}} | {{Failure to pay under GMSLA}} | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Revision as of 11:47, 27 June 2019
|
GMSLA Anatomy™
Notwithstanding the above, such a failure will not be an Event of Default.
However this will not be an Event of Default.
9.2 Lender’s failure to deliver Equivalent Collateral: If Lender fails to deliver Equivalent Collateral comprising Non Cash Collateral in accordance with paragraph 8.4 or 8.5, Borrower may:
For the avoidance of doubt, any such failure shall not constitute an Event of Default (including under paragraph 10.1(i)) unless the Parties otherwise agree.
then the Transferor agrees to pay within one Business Day of a demand from the Transferee and hold harmless the Transferee with respect to all reasonable costs and expenses listed in sub paragraphs (a) and (b) above properly incurred which arise directly from such failure other than (i) such costs and expenses which arise from the negligence or wilful default of the Transferee and (ii) any indirect or consequential losses.
|
Table of contents
- 9.1 Borrower’s failure to deliver Equivalent Securities
- 9.2 Lender’s failure to deliver Equivalent Collateral
- 9.3 Failure by either Party to deliver
Mini close-out
This is the fabled mini close-out provision of the 2010 GMSLA.
Failure to return Collateral or Securities is not an Event of Default. What is then?
Noting the exception for redelivery of Equivalent Securities or Collateral,[1] the failure to pay or deliver Events of Default under the 2010 GMSLA are:
- Cash Collateral failures: Any failure to pay or repay cash Collateral when required — the theory being that you can’t blame an upstream counterparty for your failure to deliver cash[2];
- Non-cash Collateral delivery failures: Any failure to deliver non-cash Collateral (either at inception of by way of further Collateral). Here the Borrower has discretion[3] on what Collateral it delivers, so again doesn't have the excuse that it has suffered an upstream failure. Where it is a Collateral return, the Lender has less discretion, so is more prone to upstream settlement failures. Note that non-delivery of Securities at the commencement of a Loan is not a failure to pay, also for “potential upstream failure” reasons: it just means the Loan doesn’t happen.
- Mini closeout failures: Any failure to pay following exercise of a mini closeout under Paragraph 9. That is, not a failure to redeliver Equivalent Collateral or Securities themselves, but a failure to settle any mini close-out or buy-in following the mini closeout.
References
- ↑ See 9.1(b) and 9.2(b).
- ↑ For a jauntily metaphysical examination of the nature of hard cold folding green stuff — why it is, by nature, profoundly different to any other financial instrument, see our article on cash.
- ↑ From those assets that meet the eligibility criteria in the Schedule; moral of story: don’t allow yourself to be too tightly constrained on eligibility criteria.