Credit Support - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "This term does ''not'' appear in the {{csa}} but it really should. If it did, one could avoid a wealth of wasted flannel: “{{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} or {{csaprov|E..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This term does ''not'' appear in the {{csa}} but it really should. If it did, one could avoid a wealth of wasted flannel: “{{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} or {{csaprov|Equivalent Credit Support}} [[as the case may be]]” kind of thing. And {{csaprov|Delivery Amount}} or {{csaprov|Return Amount}} [[as the case may be]].
{{anat|csa}}This term does ''not'' appear in the {{csa}} but it really should. If it did, one could avoid a wealth of wasted flannel: “{{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} or {{csaprov|Equivalent Credit Support}} [[as the case may be]]” kind of thing. And {{csaprov|Delivery Amount}} or {{csaprov|Return Amount}} [[as the case may be]].


But what kind of lawyer can resist spreading {{f|flannel}} far and wide, honestly?
But when a golden opportunity presents itself, what kind of [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]] can resist spreading {{f|flannel}} far and wide, honestly?
 
{{anat|csa}}

Revision as of 12:06, 8 December 2016

CSA Anatomy™

{{{2}}}

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

This term does not appear in the 1995 CSA but it really should. If it did, one could avoid a wealth of wasted flannel: “Eligible Credit Support or Equivalent Credit Support as the case may be” kind of thing. And “Delivery Amount or Return Amount as the case may be”.

But when a golden opportunity presents itself, what kind of lawyer can resist spreading flannel far and wide, honestly?