Credit Support - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "This term does ''not'' appear in the {{csa}} but it really should. If it did, one could avoid a wealth of wasted flannel: “{{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} or {{csaprov|E..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This term does ''not'' appear in the {{csa}} but it really should. If it did, one could avoid a wealth of wasted flannel: “{{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} or {{csaprov|Equivalent Credit Support}} [[as the case may be]]” kind of thing. And {{csaprov|Delivery Amount}} or {{csaprov|Return Amount}} [[as the case may be]]. | {{anat|csa}}This term does ''not'' appear in the {{csa}} but it really should. If it did, one could avoid a wealth of wasted flannel: “{{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} or {{csaprov|Equivalent Credit Support}} [[as the case may be]]” kind of thing. And “{{csaprov|Delivery Amount}} or {{csaprov|Return Amount}} [[as the case may be]]”. | ||
But what kind of lawyer can resist spreading {{f|flannel}} far and wide, honestly? | But when a golden opportunity presents itself, what kind of [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]] can resist spreading {{f|flannel}} far and wide, honestly? | ||
Revision as of 12:06, 8 December 2016
CSA Anatomy™
{{{2}}}
|
This term does not appear in the 1995 CSA but it really should. If it did, one could avoid a wealth of wasted flannel: “Eligible Credit Support or Equivalent Credit Support as the case may be” kind of thing. And “Delivery Amount or Return Amount as the case may be”.
But when a golden opportunity presents itself, what kind of lawyer can resist spreading flannel far and wide, honestly?