Template:JC favourites: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
'''[[:category:book review|Book reviews]]''' culled from twenty indolent years sounding off on Amazon; <br> | '''[[:category:book review|Book reviews]]''' culled from twenty indolent years sounding off on Amazon; <br> | ||
'''Much flippancy''' about [[plain English]], [[buzzword]]s, [[technology]], [[negotiation]], [[flannel]], [[Latin]], [[Greeks|Greek]], [[metaphor]] and [[:category:Egg|egg]]s. <br> | '''Much flippancy''' about [[plain English]], [[buzzword]]s, [[technology]], [[negotiation]], [[flannel]], [[Latin]], [[Greeks|Greek]], [[metaphor]] and [[:category:Egg|egg]]s. <br> | ||
|{{isdaprov|Cross Default}} under an ISDA: that fabulously pointless {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}. <br> | |{{top}} | ||
{{isdaprov|Cross Default}} under an ISDA: that fabulously pointless {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}. <br> | |||
{{pbprov|Synthetic prime brokerage}}: What is it? How is it different from natural prime brokerage? Can I iron it? <br> | {{pbprov|Synthetic prime brokerage}}: What is it? How is it different from natural prime brokerage? Can I iron it? <br> | ||
{{csaprov|Independent Amount}}: What’s that again? <br> | {{csaprov|Independent Amount}}: What’s that again? <br> | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
“Tell me about {{casenote|Fardell|Potts}}”: A. P. Herbert’s famous fictional case of the [[reasonable woman]]. Is there such a thing? (Spoiler: in the eyes of the law, ''No''.)<br> | “Tell me about {{casenote|Fardell|Potts}}”: A. P. Herbert’s famous fictional case of the [[reasonable woman]]. Is there such a thing? (Spoiler: in the eyes of the law, ''No''.)<br> | ||
“Tell me about {{casenote|Miller|Jackson}}: Is [[cricket]] ''capable'' of being a [[nuisance]]? (Spoiler: it’s controversial. But, in the eyes of the law, ''yes''.)<br> | “Tell me about {{casenote|Miller|Jackson}}: Is [[cricket]] ''capable'' of being a [[nuisance]]? (Spoiler: it’s controversial. But, in the eyes of the law, ''yes''.)<br> | ||
“[[ | “[[I’m not going to die in a ditch about it]]”: When to use that greatest of all [[negotiation]] climb-downs.<br> | ||
“[[Teldar Paper|teldar paper]]” Greed is, for lack of a better word ...? <br> | “[[Teldar Paper|teldar paper]]” Greed is, for lack of a better word ...? <br> | ||
“[[Notwithstanding anything to the contrary]]”: But, why did you ''say'' something to the contrary? <br> | “[[Notwithstanding anything to the contrary]]”: But, why did you ''say'' something to the contrary? <br> |
Revision as of 14:10, 18 January 2020
What’s in here |
Your favourite pages |
Our favourites searches |
Anatomies: Clause-by-clause Anatomy and nutshell guides (hit the bar on the left) to ISDA and other master trading agreements. These may be incomplete, out of date, out of touch, flippant — well, they are flippant — but will still be better value and more entertaining than that awful FT book about derivatives; |
Cross Default under an ISDA: that fabulously pointless Event of Default. |
“Does Kilimanjaro rise above the Serengeti?” The question every Toto fan wants answered. (Spoiler: No.) |