Template:JC favourites: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Tabletopsuperflex|align=center|cellpadding=15|verticalalign=top|width=100|border=none|background=#F5FAFF}}
{{jcf|
{{cellwidthflex|cellpadding=15|verticalalign=top|width=33|border=none|background=#d0e5f5}} 
'''<big>{{Helvetica|What’s in here}}</big>''' <br>The sidebar on the left should help you.
{{cellwidthflex|cellpadding=15|verticalalign=top|width=34|border=none|background=#d0e5f5}} 
'''<big>{{Helvetica|Your favourite pages}}</big>''' <br>What the Google says you’ve been reading this month.
{{cellwidthflex|cellpadding=15|verticalalign=top|width=33|border=none|background=#d0e5f5}} 
'''<big>{{Helvetica|Our favourites searches}}</big>''' <br>Your best questions this month.
|-
|{{top}}
'''[[Anatomy|Anatomies]]''': Clause-by-clause [[Anatomy]] and [[nutshell]] guides (hit the bar on the left) to [[ISDA Master Agreement|ISDA]] and other [[master trading agreement]]s. These may be incomplete, out of date, out of touch, flippant — well, they ''are'' flippant —  but will still be better value and more entertaining than that awful [[FT book about derivatives]]; <br>
'''[[Anatomy|Anatomies]]''': Clause-by-clause [[Anatomy]] and [[nutshell]] guides (hit the bar on the left) to [[ISDA Master Agreement|ISDA]] and other [[master trading agreement]]s. These may be incomplete, out of date, out of touch, flippant — well, they ''are'' flippant —  but will still be better value and more entertaining than that awful [[FT book about derivatives]]; <br>
'''[[:category:book review|Book reviews]]''' culled from twenty indolent years sounding off on Amazon; <br>
'''[[:category:book review|Book reviews]]''' culled from twenty indolent years sounding off on Amazon; <br>
'''Much flippancy''' about [[plain English]], [[buzzword]]s, [[technology]], [[negotiation]], [[flannel]], [[Latin]], [[Greeks|Greek]], [[metaphor]] and [[:category:Egg|egg]]s. <br>
'''Much flippancy''' about [[plain English]], [[buzzword]]s, [[technology]], [[negotiation]], [[flannel]], [[Latin]], [[Greeks|Greek]], [[metaphor]] and [[:category:Egg|egg]]s. <br>
|{{top}}
And [[Toto]].
{{isdaprov|Cross Default}} under an ISDA: that fabulously pointless {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}. <br>
|
{{pbprov|Synthetic prime brokerage}}: What is it? How is it different from natural prime brokerage? Can I iron it? <br>
'''{{isdaprov|Cross Default}} under an ISDA''': That most pointless of all {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}. <br>
{{csaprov|Independent Amount}}: What’s that again? <br>
'''{{pbprov|Synthetic prime brokerage}}:''' What even ''is'' it? How is it different from ''natural'' [[prime brokerage]]? Can you iron it? <br>
[[Assignment by way of security]]: Is it the same as a [[charge]]? <br>
'''{{csaprov|Independent Amount}}''': It’s collateral that’s mouthy. <br>
{{isdaprov|Automatic Early Termination}} {{icds}}’s “clever” end-run for silly insolvency regimes. What’s that all about?<br>
'''[[Assignment by way of security]]''': Is it the same as a [[charge]]? <br>
{{isdaprov|Netting of Payments}}: The ISDA clause that shouldn’t be! <br>
'''{{isdaprov|Automatic Early Termination}}''': {{icds}}’s “clever” end-run for silly insolvency regimes. What’s that all about?<br>
{{isdaprov|Set-off}}: Is it the same as [[close-out netting]]?<br>
'''{{isdaprov|Netting of Payments}}''': The ISDA clause that shouldn’t be! <br>
{{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}: Is it the same as a [[Credit Support Annex]]? (Spoiler: In America, ''Yes''... in England, ''No.'')<br>
'''{{isdaprov|Set-off}}''': Is it the same as [[close-out netting]]?<br>
[[ISDA Comparison]] What are the differences bvetween a {{1992ma}} and a {{2002ma}}? Should I care? (Spoiler: ''No''.)<br>
'''{{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}''': Is it the same as a [[Credit Support Annex]]? (Spoiler: In America, ''Yes''... in England, ''No.'')<br>
Lastly, {{casenote|Tai Hing Cotton Mill|Liu Chong Hing Bank}}: A great case, fallen on hard times.
'''[[ISDA Comparison]]''': What are the differences bvetween a {{1992ma}} and a {{2002ma}}? Should I care? (Spoiler: ''No''.)<br>
|{{top}}
'''{{casenote|Tai Hing Cotton Mill|Liu Chong Hing Bank}}''': A great case, fallen on hard times. But it seems to be piquing interest at the moment.
“[[Africa|Does Kilimanjaro rise above the Serengeti]]?” The question every [[Toto]] fan wants answered. (Spoiler: ''No''.)<br>
|
“Tell me about {{casenote|Fardell|Potts}}”: A. P. Herbert’s famous fictional case of the [[reasonable woman]]. Is there such a thing? (Spoiler: in the eyes of the law, ''No''.)<br>
'''[[Africa|Does Kilimanjaro rise above the Serengeti]]?'''” The question every [[Toto]] fan wants answered. (Spoiler: ''No''.)<br>
“Tell me about {{casenote|Miller|Jackson}}: Is [[cricket]] ''capable'' of being a [[nuisance]]? (Spoiler: it’s controversial. But, in the eyes of the law, ''yes''.)<br>
“'''Tell me about {{casenote|Fardell|Potts}}'''”: A. P. Herbert’s famous fictional case of the [[reasonable woman]]. Is there such a thing? (Spoiler: in the eyes of the law, ''No''.)<br>
“[[I’m not going to die in a ditch about it]]”: When to use that greatest of all [[negotiation]] climb-downs.<br>
“'''Tell me about {{casenote|Miller|Jackson}}'''”: Is [[cricket]] ''capable'' of being a [[nuisance]]? (Spoiler: it’s controversial. But, in the eyes of the law, ''yes''.)<br>
“[[Teldar Paper|teldar paper]]” Greed is, for lack of a better word ...? <br>
'''[[I’m not going to die in a ditch about it]]'''”: When to use that greatest of all [[negotiation]] climb-downs.<br>
“[[Notwithstanding anything to the contrary]]”: But, why did you ''say'' something to the contrary? <br>
'''[[Teldar Paper|teldar paper]]'''Must be some old-school Oliver Stone fans out there. Greed is, for lack of a better word ...? <br>
“Does [[Africa|Kilimanjaro rise like ''Olympus'' above the Serengeti]]?” More [[Toto]] fan correspondence action. <br>
'''[[Notwithstanding anything to the contrary]]'''”: But, why did you ''say'' something to the contrary? <br>
“[[Olympus|Is Mt. Olympus anywhere near the Serengeti]]?” Okay, Mr Lukather, that’s eenough now. It was funny the first time.
“'''Does [[Africa|Kilimanjaro rise like ''Olympus'' above the Serengeti]]?'''” More [[Toto]] fan correspondence action. <br>
{{tablebottom}}
'''[[Olympus|Is Mt. Olympus anywhere near the Serengeti]]?'''” Okay, Mr. Lukather, that’s enough now. It was funny the first time.
}}

Revision as of 17:57, 18 January 2020

The Devil’s Advocate
Notes on the absurdity of office life.

For the legal eagles
Common legal agreements, examined.

For malcontents
Miscellany. And eggs.

Anatomies: Clause-by-clause Anatomy and nutshell guides (hit the bar on the left) to ISDA and other master trading agreements. These may be incomplete, out of date, out of touch, flippant — well, they are flippant — but will still be better value and more entertaining than that awful FT book about derivatives;
Book reviews culled from twenty indolent years sounding off on Amazon;
Much flippancy about plain English, buzzwords, technology, negotiation, flannel, Latin, Greek, metaphor and eggs.
And Toto.

Cross Default under an ISDA: That most pointless of all Event of Default.
Synthetic prime brokerage: What even is it? How is it different from natural prime brokerage? Can you iron it?
Independent Amount: It’s collateral that’s mouthy.
Assignment by way of security: Is it the same as a charge?
Automatic Early Termination: ISDA’s crack drafting squad™’s “clever” end-run for silly insolvency regimes. What’s that all about?
Netting of Payments: The ISDA clause that shouldn’t be!
Set-off: Is it the same as close-out netting?
Credit Support Document: Is it the same as a Credit Support Annex? (Spoiler: In America, Yes... in England, No.)
ISDA Comparison: What are the differences bvetween a 1992 ISDA and a 2002 ISDA? Should I care? (Spoiler: No.)
Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank: A great case, fallen on hard times. But it seems to be piquing interest at the moment.

Does Kilimanjaro rise above the Serengeti?” The question every Toto fan wants answered. (Spoiler: No.)
Tell me about Fardell v Potts”: A. P. Herbert’s famous fictional case of the reasonable woman. Is there such a thing? (Spoiler: in the eyes of the law, No.)
Tell me about Miller v Jackson”: Is cricket capable of being a nuisance? (Spoiler: it’s controversial. But, in the eyes of the law, yes.)
I’m not going to die in a ditch about it”: When to use that greatest of all negotiation climb-downs.
teldar paper” Must be some old-school Oliver Stone fans out there. Greed is, for lack of a better word ...?
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary”: But, why did you say something to the contrary?
Does Kilimanjaro rise like Olympus above the Serengeti?” More Toto fan correspondence action.
Is Mt. Olympus anywhere near the Serengeti?” Okay, Mr. Lukather, that’s enough now. It was funny the first time.

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.