Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
And [[Toto]]. | And [[Toto]]. | ||
| | | | ||
'''{{isdaprov|Cross Default}} under an ISDA''': | '''{{isdaprov|Cross Default}} under an ISDA''': That most pointless of all {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}. <br> | ||
'''{{pbprov|Synthetic prime brokerage}}:''' What even ''is'' it? How is it different from natural prime brokerage? Can you iron it? <br> | '''{{pbprov|Synthetic prime brokerage}}:''' What even ''is'' it? How is it different from ''natural'' [[prime brokerage]]? Can you iron it? <br> | ||
'''{{csaprov|Independent Amount}}''': | '''{{csaprov|Independent Amount}}''': It’s collateral that’s mouthy. <br> | ||
'''[[Assignment by way of security]]''': Is it the same as a [[charge]]? <br> | '''[[Assignment by way of security]]''': Is it the same as a [[charge]]? <br> | ||
'''{{isdaprov|Automatic Early Termination}}''': {{icds}}’s “clever” end-run for silly insolvency regimes. What’s that all about?<br> | '''{{isdaprov|Automatic Early Termination}}''': {{icds}}’s “clever” end-run for silly insolvency regimes. What’s that all about?<br> | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
“'''Tell me about {{casenote|Miller|Jackson}}'''”: Is [[cricket]] ''capable'' of being a [[nuisance]]? (Spoiler: it’s controversial. But, in the eyes of the law, ''yes''.)<br> | “'''Tell me about {{casenote|Miller|Jackson}}'''”: Is [[cricket]] ''capable'' of being a [[nuisance]]? (Spoiler: it’s controversial. But, in the eyes of the law, ''yes''.)<br> | ||
“'''[[I’m not going to die in a ditch about it]]'''”: When to use that greatest of all [[negotiation]] climb-downs.<br> | “'''[[I’m not going to die in a ditch about it]]'''”: When to use that greatest of all [[negotiation]] climb-downs.<br> | ||
“'''[[Teldar Paper|teldar paper]]'''” Must be some old-school Oliver Stone fans out | “'''[[Teldar Paper|teldar paper]]'''” Must be some old-school Oliver Stone fans out there. Greed is, for lack of a better word ...? <br> | ||
“'''[[Notwithstanding anything to the contrary]]'''”: But, why did you ''say'' something to the contrary? <br> | “'''[[Notwithstanding anything to the contrary]]'''”: But, why did you ''say'' something to the contrary? <br> | ||
“'''Does [[Africa|Kilimanjaro rise like ''Olympus'' above the Serengeti]]?'''” More [[Toto]] fan correspondence action. <br> | “'''Does [[Africa|Kilimanjaro rise like ''Olympus'' above the Serengeti]]?'''” More [[Toto]] fan correspondence action. <br> | ||
“'''[[Olympus|Is Mt. Olympus anywhere near the Serengeti]]?'''” Okay, Mr. Lukather, that’s enough now. It was funny the first time. | “'''[[Olympus|Is Mt. Olympus anywhere near the Serengeti]]?'''” Okay, Mr. Lukather, that’s enough now. It was funny the first time. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 17:51, 18 January 2020
The Devil’s Advocate |
For the legal eagles |
For malcontents |
Anatomies: Clause-by-clause Anatomy and nutshell guides (hit the bar on the left) to ISDA and other master trading agreements. These may be incomplete, out of date, out of touch, flippant — well, they are flippant — but will still be better value and more entertaining than that awful FT book about derivatives; |
Cross Default under an ISDA: That most pointless of all Event of Default. |
“Does Kilimanjaro rise above the Serengeti?” The question every Toto fan wants answered. (Spoiler: No.) |
Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here. |