Credit Support - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 00:05, 1 January 2020

CSA Anatomy™

Resources Full wikitext \| Nutshell wikitext English Law \| 1 Interpretation \| 2 Credit Support Obligations \| 3 Transfers, Calculations and Exchanges \| 4 Dispute Resolution \| 5 Transfer of Title, No Security Interest, Distributions and Interest Amount \| 6 Default \| 7 Representation \| 8 Expenses \| 9 Miscellaneous \| 10 Definitions \| 11 Elections and Variables · Base Currency and Eligible Currency · Credit Support Obligations · Valuation and Timing · Exchange Date · Dispute Resolution · Distributions and Interest Amount · Addresses for Transfers · Credit Support Offsets · Other CSA 2018 ISDA Credit Support Deed for Initial Margin Index: Click ᐅ to expand: CSA

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you. Sign up for our newsletter.

I know, I know: the term Credit Support does not appear in the 1995 CSA. But really, it should. If it did, one could avoid a wealth of wasted flannel: “Eligible Credit Support or Equivalent Credit Support as the case may be” kind of thing. And “Delivery Amount or Return Amount as the case may be”.

But when a golden opportunity presents itself, what kind of lawyer can resist spreading flannel far and wide, honestly?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{anat|csa}}This term does ''not'' appear in the {{csa}} but it really should. If it did, one could avoid a wealth of wasted
+{{a|csa|}}{{credit support|Csa}}
-{{t|flannel}}: “{{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} or {{csaprov|Equivalent Credit Support}} [[as the case may be]]” kind of thing. And “{{csaprov|Delivery Amount}} or {{csaprov|Return Amount}} [[as the case may be]]”.
-But when a golden opportunity presents itself, what kind of [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]] can resist spreading {{f|flannel}} far and wide, honestly?